|
Article Publishing
|
~ striking similarities science and open source |
Science vs Open Source. They have some striking similarities: science studies are audited by other scientists to ensure the study is correct. Open Source code is audited by other programmers to ensure the code is correct.
Code must be repeatable: it must work on millions of machines reliably. Science must be repeatable: if you cannot repeat an experiment then it is not a reliable study.
Science data is open, or it isn't good. Science studies must be available in journals and accessible, otherwise no one will utilize the science data or improve it. Open source code is exactly similar.
A science study is like a computer program that sets up the state of the program or science study. There are variables, constants, restrictions, and algorithms (methods) that the science study or code must follow. Any errors or issues with the study or code must be corrected, or the study/code will be found to be unreliable and not fit for further use.
Lies are not tolerated in science. Criminal behavior is not tolerated in science. I.e. stalking another scientist, taunting him, fucking with his head, invading all his privacies: Big no no. This is where things differ between science and programming: criminal behavior (hacking) is of course "cool" and hip in programming circles. However, lies, in code (code that is incorrect or mind games) is not tolerated, unless, it is a trojan or virus that infects and purposely plays head games with the user of the computer. In human conversation (meetup events) scientists and programmers will often have viruses installed on their brain and "fuck" with other participants of the meetup events, but, when they go and check/write code, they prefer there to be no mind games, viruses, or lies. There is the case, where criminal behavior and science can go hand and hand: technology. The CIA and secret service, and gang members, and other organizations, will indeed use science to enable their criminal behaviors, such as the science and physics of how microphones work to illegally tap someone's home (bug it) or using science to illegally bomb someone's property using chemicals and chemistry equations.
Honesty is valued in science, so much that anyone that is dishonest intentionally, gets kicked out. If someone makes a mistake and was not purposely dishonest, this is no problem in both programming and science: human make mistakes. Intentional dishonesty is not valued in open source or science, as it leads to bad code, bad science studies. Yet, in human interactions with a fuckwit scientist or programmer? Dishonesty, lies, corruption, and secrets, are part of the every day event and conversation, up in Canada - and probably in other countries too.
The hypocrisy indeed of the fuckwit brain, part of "human". Hold two simultaneous positions that contradict each other: prefer no lies or mind games in your perfect code, that has been audited by 50893 other smart people. Checkmark. And same goes for science: prefer a study done that has been checked by 50893 (or even just 54) other scientists and confirmed to not have lies/games being played in the study, or false data. But, when you actually interact with other human beings at meetup events: none of these rules apply. When you have access to technology that can fuck with other people using psychological warfare: again none of these rules apply. Correctness and good code, is simply not installed on the human brain: The human brain has evolved to fuck with and play mind games with other people, only to come back and backfire on the morons in the retard asylum known as "earth".
These fuckwits couldn't audit their own conversations with humans (a buggy IPC mechanism sending data over the mouth to the ear to another processor). Scientists and programmers do not audit their own assinine human behavior nor do they check their own brains for shitty code, but they sure as well audit and ensure the correctness of their own science studies and code on github.
Simplicity in science and programming: simple solutions are better than complex ones. Again some real striking similarities. So striking that basically science and open source seem oddly related to the level of almost exact equivalence.
Head games and lies in code: bad. Head games and lies in science studies: bad. Anyone who does this in science circles or coding groups will simply get kicked out of the group, unless, that person is a virus/trojan writer that purposely writes mind game code to fuck with other computers and computer users. The equivalent in science would be someone who purposely publishes false studies that people actually believe. Eventually they are found out, and kicked out of science/programming. But in conversation at meetups, or around town when interacting with other humans? These are where lies, criminal behavior, psychological warfare, corruption, false data, and head games are perfectly acceptable and tolerated.
The hypocrisy is strong. Next time you meet up with a good programmer and he fucks with your head, or next time you meet up with a scientist and he fucks with your head, keeps secrets... ask yourself: why is it okay for humans to fuck with each other, keep secrets, and play psychological mind games... But in open source code and science studies published in journals, that's not acceptable and will get you kicked out the door? Because you are a fucking faggot and retard?
Time to brew some hypocrisy coffee for all faggots to drink. Fuck you, and another article written. See also science is a bad joke
|
|